L. A. Falabella
To Win
M. Figl
To Win
Maximilian Figl vs Adil Karakayev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W W W L W
Form
L L L L W L L W L LHead-2-Head: Figl 1 - 0 Karakayev
They have played 2 sets in total, with Figl winning 2 and Karakayev winning 0. The last match between Figl and Karakayev was at the M15 Antalya, 08-01-2024, Q2 round, Clay with Maximilian Figl getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maximilian Figl | 1 |
| Adil Karakayev | 0 |
M15 Antalya(08-01-2024)
6
0
6
2
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Vukic VS Nishikori PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cirstea VS Baptiste PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
Maximilian Figl
Player
Adil Karakayev
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
21
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:46:0 | Average Match Time | 0:46:0 |
| 68% (25/37) | 1st Serve % | 59% (23/39) |
| 76% (19/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 35% (8/23) |
| 75% (9/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (4/16) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 69% (27/39) | Return Points Win % | 24% (9/37) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maximilian Figl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Maximilian Figl
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Figl
Player
Mario Mansilla Diez
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Figl
Player
Alessandro Spadola
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Silvio Mencaglia
Player
Maximilian Figl
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Maximilian Figl
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Adil Karakayev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandr Lobanov
Player
Adil Karakayev
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
34%
(
21 of
61)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adil Karakayev
Player
Tushar Sharma
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
Player
Adil Karakayev
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Maximilian Figl
Player
Adil Karakayev
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Ibragimov
Player
Adil Karakayev
48%
(
12 of
25)
1st Serve %
36%
(
10 of
28)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
36
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49% (75/79) | Win/Loss | 16% (4/21) |
| 51% (175/169) | Sets Win/Loss | 18% (9/42) |
| 50% (1687/1669) | Games Win/Loss | 33% (134/272) |
| 42% (13/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 17% (2/10) |
| 51% (60/58) | Clay Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) |
| 40% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 89 | Aces Total | 44 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
| 210 | Total Double Faults | 79 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 217.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 224.24 |
| 64% (2559/4006) | 1st Serve % | 52% (406/782) |
| 59% (1521/2559) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (229/406) |
| 46% (661/1447) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (140/376) |
| 46% (189/411) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (20/59) |
| 41% (1592/3865) | Return Points Win % | 34% (248/735) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (75/79) | Futures W/L | 16% (4/21) |
| 50% (74/149) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 16% (4/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (20/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (16/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 86% (79/68) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (4/4) |
| 13% (79/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (4/0) |
| 11% (75/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (21/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
